Morphology,
in linguistics, is the study of the forms of words, and the ways in which words
are related to other words of the same language. Formal differences among words
serve a variety of purposes, from the creation of new lexical items to the
indication of grammatical structure.
In lingusitics, morphology is the identification, analysis and description of
the structure of a given language's morphemes and other linguistic units, such as root words, affixes, part of speech, intonation and stresses, or implied context. In contrast, morphologycal typology is
the classification of languages according to their use of morphemes,
while lexicology is the study of those words forming a language's wordstock.
There are
three principal approaches to morphology and each tries to capture the
distinctions above in different ways:
- Morpheme-based morphology, which makes use of an item-and-arrangement approach.
- Lexeme-based morphology, which normally makes use of an item-and-process approach.
- Word-based morphology, which normally makes use of a word-and-paradigm approach.
While the
associations indicated between the concepts in each item in that list are very
strong, they are not absolute.
We have
seen above that the forms of words can carry complex and highly structured
information. Words do not serve simply as minimal signs, arbitrary chunks of
sound that bear meaning simply by virtue of being distinct from one another.
Some aspects of a word’s form may indicate the relation of its underlying
lexeme to others (markers of derivational morphology or of compound structure),
while others indicate properties of the grammatical structure within which it
is found (markers of inflectional properties). All of these relations seem to
be best construed as knowledge about the relations between words
however: relations between whole lexemes, even when these can be regarded as
containing markers of their relations to still other lexemes; and relations
between word forms that realize paradigmatic alternatives built on a single
lexeme’s basic stem(s) in the case of inflection. These relations connect substantively defined
classes in a way that is only partially directional in its essential nature,
and the formal connections among these classes are signalled in ways that are
best represented as processes relating one shape to another.
hi ester... after i see you're blog, it's good but it's not complete...
BalasHapus